Claude for business · Official Anthropic partner
Your team already uses Claude. Make it safe, shared, and worth the seats.
Official partners
Today
- Personal accounts
- No permission rules
- Each session starts blank
- No usage data
After the pilot
- Company workspace
- settings.json allow/deny
- Shared CLAUDE.md
- Weekly hours-saved report
What we install
Four layers, each one a file you can read
- workflows/
Workflows
PR review, ticket triage, release notes: wired into the tools your team already uses.
- hooks/
Hooks
Run before and after each tool use to log, format, test, or stop a risky action.
- CLAUDE.md
Team context
Architecture notes, coding standards and review rules every session starts with.
- settings.json
Access & permissions
What Claude may read, edit and run, and what it may never run.
allow: Read, Edit, Bash deny: rm -rf, git reset --hard
What goes wrong without a rollout
Shadow usage, a nervous security team, and seats nobody opens
“We don’t know where it actually helps.”
A ranked task shortlist
We interview each team, list the repeat tasks Claude can take (code review, ticket triage, report drafts, release notes) and rank them by hours per week. You get a shortlist, not a strategy deck.
Fix: Ranked task list per team
“Security won’t approve it.”
One permission file to review
We write the permission model: which tools Claude can use, which commands are blocked (e.g. destructive git, prod deploys), what data stays out, and hooks that log or stop risky actions. Security reviews one file, not a policy essay.
Fix: settings.json + hooks
“Leadership wants proof.”
Your numbers, weekly
We baseline each pilot workflow (time per task, cycle time) before switching it on and report the delta weekly, so the rollout decision is based on your numbers.
Fix: Baseline + weekly report
“People tried it and stopped.”
Built into where work happens
We build the workflows into where work already happens (repo, PR review, ticketing) and run hands-on sessions per team, so Claude is part of the process, not a tab people forget.
Fix: Workflows in repo, PRs, tickets
How the pilot runs
One team, four steps, a decision at the end
Typical first deployment: 6–12 weeks
Interviews & task list
We talk to the pilot team and rank repeat tasks by hours per week.
Ranked shortlistPermissions + CLAUDE.md
Allow/deny rules, hooks and shared team context, reviewed by security.
settings.json signed off3 workflows live
The top tasks run in the repo, PRs and tickets, timed against the baseline.
Weekly hours-saved reportReport & scale decision
Baseline vs. pilot, per workflow. You decide whether to roll out further.
Pilot report
What the pilot report shows
Your baseline vs. the pilot, per workflow
Every metric is measured on your team before the pilot starts, so the scale decision rests on your numbers, not ours.
Hours per task
PR / ticket cycle time
Tasks moved to Claude
FAQ
Questions teams ask before rolling out Claude
Do you deploy Claude (chat) or Claude Code?
Both, depending on the team. Engineering usually gets Claude Code in the repo; ops, support and finance get Claude with connected tools. We decide per workflow in the pilot.
How do you roll Claude out safely?
We start with one team, write explicit allow/deny tool permissions, keep sensitive systems out of scope, and add hooks that log or block actions before anything runs company-wide.
Which teams see results first?
Engineering (reviews, tests, refactors, release notes) and ops teams with repetitive written work see results first because the tasks are frequent and easy to time.
How do you measure what Claude is worth to us?
We time the workflow before the pilot, then track hours saved per task, PR/ticket cycle time and how many tasks moved from manual to Claude-assisted.
Next step