For agency recruiters and delivery teams
4
first builds: CV triage · follow-up sequences · interview booking · ATS sync
Why now
The agency that submits a qualified shortlist first usually wins the role. Automated triage gets your shortlist out the day the req opens, not days later.
Judgement stays with the recruiter. Automation does the chasing, booking and data entry around it.
What we fix
You do this by hand: Consultants read every CV for every role.
We build this: Each CV is scored against the role's must-haves with gaps listed; top matches land in a ranked shortlist.
Result: Recruiters review a ranked shortlist; a recruiter decides.
You do this by hand: Candidates go cold because follow-ups slip.
We build this: Email → SMS → LinkedIn sequences that pause the moment a candidate replies.
Result: No candidate waits on a follow-up.
You do this by hand: One interview takes a string of emails to book.
We build this: A booking link with slots that match the hiring manager's calendar, plus reminders.
Result: One link instead of an email thread.
You do this by hand: The same JD is rewritten from scratch every time.
We build this: A structured JD draft from the client brief and your past JDs for similar roles, for recruiter edit.
Result:
You do this by hand: The ATS is out of date, so nobody trusts the pipeline report.
We build this: Every call, email and interview outcome written back to the ATS automatically.
Result: A pipeline report you can trust.
Where each automation acts on the pipeline
CVs received
Scored
Triage
Shortlist
Recruiter decides
Human approvalContacted
Follow-up sequence
Interviewed
Booking link
Offer
ATS sync
What we build
01
Every CV is parsed and scored against the role's required skills, location and right-to-work; gaps are listed; top matches land in a shortlist for recruiter review.
Expected impact
Each score lists the gaps it found, so the recruiter can see why a CV ranked where it did.
Candidate 014 — must-haves
Ranked and explained. The recruiter decides.
02
Email, SMS and LinkedIn steps run in order; the sequence pauses the moment a candidate replies and hands the conversation to the recruiter.
Expected impact
A reply on any channel stops the sequence, so nobody gets a follow-up after answering.
Sequence that stops on reply
1: Email
2: SMS
3: LinkedIn message
✓: Reply received
Remaining steps cancelled; handed to the recruiter.
Sequence stops03
Candidates pick from slots that match the hiring manager's calendar; reminders go out; outcome and notes are written to the ATS.
Expected impact
Slots come from the hiring manager's live calendar; outcomes and notes land in the ATS.
Booking one interview
| Criterion | Email ping-pong | Booking link |
|---|---|---|
| Messages to agree a time | A back-and-forth thread | One link |
| Calendar check | By hand | Both calendars |
| Reminders | No | Yes |
| ATS updated | Later, if remembered | Automatically |
04
A structured JD draft built from the client brief and your past JDs for similar roles, ready for the recruiter to edit.
Expected impact
Recruiters edit a draft instead of starting from a blank page.
How it goes live
Define must-haves per role
Required skills, experience, location and right-to-work. Scoring uses job-relevant criteria only.
Multi-channel compliance
Opt-out rules are respected across email, SMS and LinkedIn, so every sequence stays within the rules.
Decide which ATS fields automation can write
Write access is limited to the fields you choose, so nothing a recruiter entered is overwritten.
Recruiter handoff thresholds
Automation stops and hands over the moment a candidate replies or asks about pay.
ATS write-back
Call, Email, Interview feed into ATS write-back (Only the fields you approve), which updates Status & stage, Notes, Protected fields (Never overwritten).
What we measure
Requisition to shortlist
Outreach response rate
Interview scheduling lead time
Time to offer acceptance
Industry signals
FAQ
Next step